Ballrollers
GOLD MEMBER
1818 posts
Apr 08, 2009
11:18 AM
|
Pete,
6ft. 8 in., but I think I have shrunk a bit with age. LOL!
Cliff
|
Scott
1992 posts
Apr 08, 2009
2:54 PM
|
John, that is one of the reasons that 10 foot is "suggested" I also get a few here and there that spin hard with not a lot of drop, what is still there though is duration of roll, I myself value duration much more than actual depth.
----------
Just my Opinion
Scott
|
0221
160 posts
Apr 08, 2009
3:29 PM
|
Now Your talking.
|
Ballrollers
GOLD MEMBER
1821 posts
Apr 08, 2009
6:16 PM
|
In my opinion most judges are going to miss a bird spinning a second or two that does not separate from the kit, when 8 to 16 birds (the most common breaks) are breaking and separating, while he is trying to count them, and assess their depth, quality, and speed. Don't get me wrong...I can appreciate the performance. I just don't think it makes a good kit bird for competition. Fortunately they are rare enough that most of us won't have to worry about whether or not to include them! LOL!
Cliff
Last Edited by on Apr 08, 2009 6:19 PM
|
winwardrollers
220 posts
Apr 08, 2009
6:20 PM
|
Cliff
I think I would have to agree with you on post 1821.
Sad but true.
bwinward
Last Edited by on Apr 08, 2009 6:21 PM
|
Scott
1993 posts
Apr 08, 2009
7:59 PM
|
The duration alone will give it seperation from those that didn't go in the break and also easily be seen by any judge worth his salt.
----------
Just my Opinion
Scott
|
cballlofts
58 posts
Apr 09, 2009
7:11 AM
|
Scott,
Is Gary Roberts posting?
Chuck
|
