SuperxRoller
70 posts
May 24, 2010
10:04 PM
|
A fancier once told me that the birds in the kit box that looks the ugliest are the better performers. How many of you guys have birds that look like crap in your kit box that perform really well?
thanks for reading
please share
|
Joe Valdivia
21 posts
May 24, 2010
10:25 PM
|
i guess it depends on your definition of ugly. i've noticed that the feathers on some of my better birds seem a bit thrashed, but i don't know if that's a good sign or not.
|
Sound Rollers
346 posts
May 25, 2010
3:38 AM
|
I would guess the hard feathered birds are the so called ugly ones.
|
Tony Chavarria
Site Publisher
4051 posts
May 25, 2010
4:16 AM
|
I won't go so far as to use the word ugly, but torn up feathers and worn seems to be about par for those harder workers.
----------
FLY ON!
Tony Chavarria
The highest form of ignorance is to reject something you know nothing about.” – Dr. Wayne W. Dyer
|
SuperxRoller
71 posts
May 25, 2010
3:07 PM
|
Sorry fellas let me rephrase. Birds that have feathers that are worn down and out of place after working hard. I'm sure you guys know what I am trying to say.
|
wannaroll
201 posts
May 25, 2010
9:40 PM
|
I had a bird I named the "Runt". He was real small (2/3 size of normal)black and cawed like a crow, but he rolled his ass off (tight, fast & deep) right up until the time a falcon had him for lunch.
----------
Dave - Hesperia, CA.
(San Bernardino Mountain Spinners)
|